Presentation Overkill June 18, 2008
Posted by darashikoh in Presentation.Tags: Advanced Microsoft Office Documents - Inside Out, Emails, Stephanie Kreiger
trackback
While I have always harped on a the way you present material which flows out of your mailbox (like docs, ppts, xls, vsds, mpps etc.) ………….I would also like to quote Stephanie Kreiger – the author of ‘Advanced Microsoft Office Documents – Inside Out’ where she says ………………
” A poorly crafted business graphic is like wearing sweaty gym clothes to walk the red carpet at the Academy Awards. You’ll definitely get attention, but is that really the impression you want to make?”
Elsewhere she also mentions …………its the content that matters and the way you present it. These should only go to hilight the content and not kill it or hilight it in the wrong way. She compares it to a lady with good body features – who chooses an attire and jewellery ……..to hilight her features and not to hilight the attire itself.
She also quotes Coco Chanel ……”Dress sharply and they notice the dress. Dress impeccably and they notice the woman.”
So it is very mandatory to choose the appropriate kind of way to present whatever you want to present.
We tend to ignore the way we compose our mails. We are okay if it is less than perfect. We do not realize that our emails are the brand ambassadors which carry our image internally within and across the organization. I am not going to get into email etiquette ……..but would definitely like to leave the reader thinking about how perfect do we really bother to compose our emails.
I recently received an email from a colleague ………..who is quite a perfectionist. This is the email I received:
Hi All,
Please find below the activity sequence and coverage for the Cairo visit.

Let me know if there are any activities missing – which we may add. Please note that although the initial part of the activity sequence covers Smart Cards – the later part of the activities is to cover both the Portal and Smart Card discussions.
Regards
…
Now I would leave it to the readers to interpret this mail. Do you feel this was overkill – that the author was resorting to pictorial representation of something which could have otherwise been represented as a drab bulletised list or a table of some sort.
Yours truly thinks that picture was appropriate and well represented ……………and even complimented the author of the email. It did create a minor split amongst the recepients of the email. Some applauded ……and some thought it was grossly unnecessary. But what do readers think?
I would certainly be very interested to know the author?
effort.
Leave apart that, yes this email certainly provides a very precise and good picture of the flow of events. This would give clarity to any novice on how to proceed next. I will surely appreciate the author for his/her
Also i would tell that not everytime we will be able to provide such branded stuff for each and every activity at work. And ceratinly it would be a overkill of time, if the recipients were into the project and also were aware of the proceeding and just wanted an info on sequencing the activity.
The matter presented should more so depend on the recipient of the mail. And presentability should be dependent on the matter to be conveyed and to whom. Next come the style you adopt to convey it. Let me know u’r feelers rajiv.
Yes that is true. One should always keep the recepients and context in mind when doing any branding of your work and ideas.
Absolutely agree with you both Kavitha and Rajiv.
I have been personally impacted by this in my previous assignment. My manager used to insist on very fancy presentation with objectives, 3 or 4 options, pros and cons for each and on top of it a diagramatic representation of the timelines etc for summarization.
Once, for a small shift on timeline change for a testing task, 3 of us incl.my manager spent 6 hrs each (skipping our lunch) and sent it to client. The sad part is the client didn’t understand due to their limited knowledge of the language and asked us to explain the same. Actually the client was so approachable and sitting in the next cabin only
The same thing in my opinion could have been accomplished in 5 minutes by just walking to them and discussing the same orally.
So, lesson learnt is use tools and techniques judiciously, keeping in mind the need and audience.